Monday, April 21, 2008

Some years ago, Kanner and Asperger identified populations of children that appeared to have some severe communication and socialization difficulties. The terms "autism" and "Asperger Syndrome" were born. For this blog, I am particularly interested in the term "autism" and the beliefs that have evolved around this term.



A belief (from Wikipedia) is the psychological state in which an individual holds a proposition or premise to be true. The article on "belief" in Wikipedia goes on to talk about Epistemology.



"Epistemology is the philosophical study of knowledge and belief. A primary problem for epistemology is exactly what is needed in order for us to have knowledge. In a notion derived from Plato's dialogue Theaetetus, philosophy has traditionally defined knowledge as justified true belief. The relationship between belief and knowledge is that a belief is knowledge if the belief is true, and if the believer has a justification (reasonable and necessarily plausible assertions/evidence/guidance) for believing it is true."



I have been working with people described as having autism for 25 years. I have had the extreme pleasure to work very closely with a very high number of people "with autism." I am interested in several core assertions about autism that I think should be challenged as untrue. In my experience, these assertions are not justifiable, or plausible. The four core assertions that I would like to challenge are the following:



  • There is such a thing as autism
  • Children with autism have a common disorder
  • In all children with autism, there is a common neurological anomaly.
  • Autism is the same from time to time and place to place.



I will be periodically making installments challenging these core beliefs, and I would love to hear your comments. In introducing yourselves, please give me a few notes about your experience with autism, or with people described as having autism.